玛雅彩票手机版 - 玛雅彩票手机版APP

来源：玛雅彩票规则2024-05-14 17:48

贵州加快水利现代化建设全面提升水安全保障能力******

　　多彩贵州网讯（本网记者彭典徐昆）1月10日，记者从省政府新闻办召开的贵州水利“百库大会战”新闻发布会上获悉，贵州加快水利现代化建设，全面提升水安全保障能力。

　　省水利厅将深入实施贵州省“十四五”水利发展规划、贵州省水网建设规划等重点规划，围绕提升水安全保障能力、破解工程性缺水问题、推动水利高质量发展目标，全力以赴加快水利现代化建设。

新闻发布会现场

　　加快贵州水网建设，全面提升水安全保障能力。围绕建设“一核四区”大水网，以水利“百库大会战”为抓手，重点推进凤山、观音等在建工程建设，新开工花滩子、英武、石龙等一批大中小型水库，加快黔中、夹岩调水大通道建设和水库配套输配水网络建设，实施一批引提调水和连通工程，推进农村供水管网和灌区建设，全面保障城镇、30户以上村寨、300亩以上连片耕地、高标准农田和产业园区等用水需求。“十四五”期基本建成黔中水网和黔西北水网，同步推进黔东南、黔东北、黔西南水网建设，到2035年全面形成贵州大水网。

　　加快水旱灾害防御体系建设，全力保障人民群众安全。深入落实“两个坚持，三个转变”的防灾减灾救灾理念，按照“消隐患、强弱项”的思路，加强大江大河主要支流和中小河流治理、病险水库除险加固、山洪灾害防治、城市防洪体系建设，强化流域防洪调度，探索推进数字孪生流域建设，整体提升洪涝灾害防御能力和超标准洪水应对能力，保障人民群众生命财产安全和经济社会健康稳定发展。

　　加快供水“四化”建设，提升城乡供水保障能力。全面推进输配水网络建设，打通生产生活生态用水“最后一公里”。按照“规模化发展、标准化建设、专业化管理、企业化运营”的思路，整体推进城乡供水一体化发展，助力乡村振兴。

　　加快水生态治理修复，守好“两江”生态屏障。坚持绿色发展、水利先行的思路，系统推进水土流失综合治理、生态清洁型小流域综合治理、重点河湖生态修复、小水电分类整改和绿色转型升级、水系连通及水美乡村建设、湖库生态渔业发展，全面加强水生态文明建设和水生态产业发展。

　　加快智慧水利建设，全面提升水利信息化水平。按照“需求牵引、应用至上、数字赋能、提升能力”要求，以保障流域防洪、供水和水生态的安全为目标，以提升流域综合治理和管理能力为核心，以提升水利监测现代化水平为支撑，围绕“一云一网一平台”总体框架，推进云计算、大数据、移动互联、物联网、5G等新一代信息技术与水利活动全面深度融合，加快数字化转型，积极推进数字孪生流域、数字孪生水利工程项目试点建设，逐步构建数字化、网络化、智能化的智慧水利体系。

玛雅彩票手机版

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.